New Word Alive 2008

I just got back today from New Word Alive in Pwllheli. I won’t give a comprehensive report, because I’m sure Adrian Warnock and others have already done that admirably, but I thought I would mention a few highlights and general reflections.

Having three small children and being offsite meant that I didn’t get to quite as many sessions as I would normally manage. I missed most of Terry Virgo’s talk because my youngest son Joel was making too much noise, but fortunately I have heard Terry speak on that passage a few times already so I at least knew roughly what I was missing! I also didn’t get to attend any afternoon sessions. Tim Chester had a very interesting looking seminar series that I might have to see if I can get hold of the recordings for.

Don Carson – 1 John

Don Carson covered 1 John in his four morning Bible teaching sessions. He started off by warning that to omit fact that sin is deeply offensive to God from your presentation of the gospel, whether intentionally or not, will lead to a serious distortion of the gospel, even if the other things you say are true. Whilst he did not mention the "emerging church" directly, it was clear that he was deliberately tackling their way of framing the gospel message.

One very interesting point he made was concerning our attitude as Christians to our own sin. If we consider it trivial, he argued that we are likely to try to attempt to fix it by simply trying a bit harder. Whereas when we see the true horror of its offence to God, we are driven back to the cross. In other words, a low view of the seriousness of sin leads to legalism, whilst a high view leads to grace.

Also on the subject of sin, he made a helpful observation on 1 John 3:9 which literally says that a Christian "cannot sin". He said that we try to wriggle out of it by translating it "cannot keep on sinning", because it is a present continuous verb tense. But he argued for a different understanding of the word "cannot". He gave an example of his school teacher who told him "you cannot chew gum here". In this context it is not meant that it is impossible to chew gum in school, but rather that it is absolutely not permitted. So a Christian cannot sin, in the sense that it is strictly prohibited. It is not OK. And when, tragically, we do, we are sent back to the cross where we find grace and mercy.

John Piper – Suffering

I only got to hear Piper’s second sermon on suffering, and though I have heard and read him on this subject several times before, it was amazing to be there and hear him preach on a topic that most preachers would run a mile from. His answer could really be described as a defence of the seventh point of "7 point Calvinism", or, "the best of all possible worlds".

The argument runs like this. God desires above all things to display his glory. He does so supremely by displaying his grace, which he does supremely through the death of his Son. There will never be a greater display of his glory in all eternity – even the second coming will not compare. Thus if God always planned that his Son would be killed, he must also have planned that there would be killers and even that there be such a thing as killing and death.

From here he argued that even suffering then was part of an eternal plan of God, and finds its purpose in bringing glory to God. He did speak briefly of the way that healing brings glory to God and encouraged praying for healing, but he does believe that in this age, the "normative" way is for Jesus to get the glory as our "sustainer" through suffering. In eternity he will be glorified only as the "healer", as suffering will cease.

Mike Reeves – Trinity

Dave Bish had alerted me to Mike Reeve’s a couple of months ago. I downloaded a bunch of his talks on Augustine and Luther and started listening and was highly impressed and so I was very pleased to hear that he was doing a seminar series at New Word Alive. I missed the first of his three talks on the Trinity, but got to the second two and thought they were outstanding. He has a remarkable gift for making complicated doctrine and archaic church history come alive. Head over to the theology network website, where you can listen to him giving a very similar series of talks on the Trinity.

One of the most profound things he taught was that because God is Triune, he has always been able to love "the other", unlike a monadic God (e.g. Allah), who has no one to love in eternity past except himself (which would be simply selfishness). Luther said that a sinner was "man curved in on himself", and so a monadic view of God leads to a distorted theology, with a "God curved in on himself" – a god made in our own image.

Word and Spirit?

Dare I venture a word or two on the somewhat sensitive subject of how well the charismatic and non-charismatic evangelicals got on worshipping together? I guess you could say that neither side got things quite how they normally like it! The worship bands were from newfrontiers and Soul Survivor, which meant was a more contemporary feel than some non-charismatics would be used to, although the songs were often interspersed with interviews and book reviews, which did sometimes seem to make things a little disjointed.

And interestingly, while I am not a huge fan of "ministry time" which is an obligatory component of a typical charismatic worship service, I found myself thinking in a number of the meetings that people would have benefited from staying to receive prayer rather than simply rushing off to the next thing. We heard some powerful teaching that deserves some time for serious reflection and personal response.

But overall I would say that it was very encouraging to see a genuine desire to stand together for the gospel and not to make our differences become the main thing, while at the same time, not pretending that we don’t have any differences of opinion. It will be very interesting to see how this partnership develops in future New Word Alive events.

Dove of Love from Above

I was a little disturbed by the mean-spirited smirking at Brian MacLaren’s attempts at song-writing (shame on you Michael Patton and Justin Taylor). True, it was a rather ropey performance and recording of a distinctly average tune with lyrics as subtle as a Mark Driscoll sermon. And there is indeed something refreshing about the thought that even the most hip and cool of the emerging crowd can produce something as equally turgid as any imaginationless evangelical stuck in the yesteryear of modernism.

But this is not Pop Idol, where we derive more pleasure from watching no-hopers squirm as they are cut to size by cruel judges than we do from watching the minority who actually have some talent. No, in the evangelical world, we don’t just want the person with 10 talents to dominate the show. The person with one talent needs to put it to use. We’re so generous in fact that we will gladly give five star ratings to the most musically inept performances and kitsch melodies. Check out the top twenty in the Christian Rock charts on SoundClick if you don’t believe me.

Thankfully, regular readers of my site will already know of my astonishing song-writing capabilities which I am using to single-handedly turn the tide of Christian music. And so, to celebrate the fact that I have finally got the Full Faith website back online, and in anticipation of the long-awaited next Full Faith meeting to be held in Poofwelly on Sunday, I present my latest worship song, “Dove of Love from Above”. And before any of you even think of critiquing it, you need to know that “God gave me this song“.

Dove of Love from Above

I can taste your love
Shining down from above
Fitting me like a glove
Gentle as a dove
And when push comes to shove
I can never get enoughve
Of your love from above

Cover me with your loverly love,
Smother me with thy brotherly love,
My discovery of your otherly love
Soars my heart on above

A live recording will follow if they have the requisite technology in Wales.

Book Review – Stop Dating the Church (Joshua Harris)

This book has to win the prize for the most innovative title of all the books I have read so far on the subject of church. Joshua Harris made his name with a book entitled “I Kissed Dating Goodbye” which argues for “biblical courtship” over against the custom of “dating”. In this book, he uses “dating” as a metaphor for the approach that many Christians have to church – ‘trying out’ churches, but without any intention of commitment. In other words, we have a consumer mentality towards the Church. The point of this book is to challenge Christians to stop dating the Church and “fall in love with the family of God”.

The church is earth’s single best place – God’s specially designed place – to start over, to grow and to change for the glory of God

He makes it particularly clear that he is talking about commitment to a local church. It is not enough to claim to be a part of the universal church if we have no vital connection with other Christians.

If you and I identify with and love the idea of church, we must consider how we can identify with and love an actual church

He reminds us that the Church is “the bride of Christ”. Jesus loves his Church, and we should do the same. He explains from Ephesians 3 that the gospel is not just about reconciliation with God, but with one another. He does not view the existence of many denominations as being a incompatible with unity, but calls us to reject a denominational spirit.

The strongest argument I know for why you and I should love and care about the Church is that Jesus does. The greatest motivation we could ever find for being passionately committed to the Church is that Jesus is passionately committed to the Church.

He explains why we need to be part of a local church. He cites John Piper who says “Sanctification is a community project”. He warns against the sins of selfishness, pride and a critical spirit that can keep us from community. We should see our church’s faults as an opportunity to love and serve. “Stop complaining about the faults of the church, and become part of the solution.”

We’ve believed the lie that we’ll be happier the less we sacrifice or give of ourselves and or time. But the more we clutch our time, money, and comfort and selfishly refuse to give to our church, the less we receive back.

He then goes on to list the ten most important considerations when choosing a church. He strongly emphasises faithful teaching of the Word and proclamation of the gospel. He also looks for a commitment to evangelism, serving, discipline and community. The omission that many of my friends have noted is that of the charismatic element. Maybe he was trying to be non-controversial and reach a broader audience with his message (and this message certainly does deserve a broad audience), but nonetheless it is a little disappointing that nothing was mentioned of the importance of an openness to the work and gifts of the Spirit.

There is a chapter devoted to Sunday, in which he calls on us to prepare ourselves before the Sunday meeting, because we should place a high priority on the gathering together. These days we are so attuned to the danger of “legalism”, that perhaps what he says in this chapter (for example, going to bed earlier on Saturday night) might be rejected without due consideration. That would be a shame. We might see more of the gifts of the Spirit in our meetings, if we arrived ready and prepared to meet with God, rather than barely awake because we watched television into the early hours of the morning. We also need to stop judging the quality of the worship and preacher, and be ready to receive what God has to say to us.

Most of the books I have read on the subject of church have been aimed primarily at leaders, and those affecting the direction of their churches, but this one is aimed squarely at ‘ordinary’ Christians. Its seven short chapters could be read in about 10 minutes each, so it should not be intimidating towards those who are not used to reading a lot. Joshua Harris has written a compelling book, and giving a copy to someone who is on the fringe of their church, or is church-hopping, may prove very beneficial to them.

Check out this video about the book here.

The Gospel-Driven Church

Just a quick post to say that I’ve added Jared Wilson’s blog “The Gospel-Driven Church” to my list of recommended blogs. I’ve been following it for a year, and he consistently puts out some great stuff. His influences range from John Piper to Mark Driscoll to N T Wright to Dallas Willard. You can also listen to the sermons he preaches at “Element“, a teaching and worship ministry for young adults.

If you’re not already subscribed to his blog, you should do so now.

I Do Not Know Rob Bell

As part of my research for the ecclesiology course I have been teaching, I have been trying to listen to some sermons by those involved in the "emerging church". In particular, I have subscribed to the weekly sermon feed from Mars Hill Bible Church, where Rob Bell’s sermons can be heard (not to be confused with Mars Hill Church in Seattle where Mark Driscoll is the pastor, and whose sermons are also on my subscription list).

I have been hoping to catch Rob Bell explaining clearly what he believes "the gospel" is, and what it means to become a Christian, yet despite listening for several months I am still waiting. With time running out before I do my talk on the emerging church, I fear I will not manage to get an authoritative quote. If you know of one, perhaps from one of his books, do let me know.

Anyway, the sermon of his I listened to today was entitled "I Do Not Know", and was the latest in a series of sermons on Philippians. One of the good things about Rob Bell, unlike in many evangelical and emerging churches, is that he can often be found doing an expository series working his way through a section or book of the Bible.

His sermon title comes from chapter 1:22, where Paul says

If I am to go on living in the body, this will mean fruitful labour for me. Yet what shall I choose? I do not know!

From this, he draws out some points about the real pressure that Paul was under, so much so that at one point he confessed to being at the point of giving up (2 Cor 1:8). He talks about the need to admit to our doubts and struggles.

Of course, this is a recurring emphasis in the emerging church – the need for openness about the issues and battles we are facing, rather than keeping up appearances and pretending never to struggle with doubt or sin.

And what Rob Bell goes on to say about the need to "doubt your doubts" rather than just giving in to them without challenging them is excellent. However, I did think it slightly revealing that while preaching a whole sermon entitled "I do not know", he somehow managed to avoid telling the congregation that merely three verses later, Paul says

Convinced of this, I know that I will remain…

So while we should not minimise the reality of his doubts and struggles, the fact is that Paul moved past them, and arrived at a place of real certainty. It is this type of certainty that borders on being a sin in the minds of some emerging thinkers. And yet it characterises all the New Testament writers.

In what was on the whole a good sermon, Rob Bell concluded in what I thought was a disappointing manner. If you have doubts about the existence of God or the resurrection, the answer is just to do good deeds of kindness, and in so doing you become "the resurrection" or "divine" to those people around you. At this point, he was repeatedly asking his audience, "are we tracking?". No, I wasn’t tracking.

Why not? Well simply, its back to what Rob thinks the gospel is. I honestly don’t know what he believes. Sometimes he hints that he is very clear on the message of salvation by grace alone, and then out pop these statements that sound very much as though he considers beliefs irrelevant so long as you are doing good deeds. Which may be a popular sentiment, but its not the gospel.

Ecclesiology Course

Things have been a bit quiet on this blog at the moment, mainly due to a Saturday Morning Theology course I am running at the moment, on the subject of Ecclesiology – the doctrine of the church. If you are interested in seeing our notes and PowerPoint presentations, have a look here. Unfortunately, we have not been able to record any of the sessions so far.

Marks of the Church

As some of you know, I have recently started running a Saturday morning theology course at my church, which will run for five sessions over the next few months. We’ve had the first already, and I am currently working on my talk for the next session.

We will be looking at the "Marks of the Church". The way I am planning to tackle it is to start off by looking at some important historical formulations of what the marks of a true church are. The two main ones I have come up with are:

1. The Nicene Creed

The Nicene creed simply states "We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church". These four points or marks of the church seem to be the main focus of Roman Catholic attempts to define the church. They emphasise its oneness, so that churches not part of Roman Catholicism are not considered true churches. Also under the term "apostolic" they include the concept of apostolic succession as well as apostolic doctrine. So while the Nicene creed is an "ecumenical creed" in that Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant Christians will all assent to it, their interpretations of this statement can vary.

2. The Reformers

When I looked through Calvin’s Institutes to see what he said about the church, I was surprised by the simplicity of his answer. He simply defined the marks of a true church as right preaching of the word and right administration of the sacraments. Having spoken to various other people, it has become clear that the reformers did in fact have more to say on the nature of the church than just those two things (e.g. worship, biblical discipline/order, compassionate ministry of deacons, mission etc), but still I find it interesting that those two are picked out as the key marks. The high place of the "sacraments" in their ecclesiology is not matched by most of the modern books on church I have read.

Modern Marks of the Church

Most modern discussions of the marks of the church seem to be more interested in answering the question "what is a healthy church", than "what is a true church". I guess we all take it for granted that our church is indeed a true church.

I have some notes gathered from various sources on what modern church leaders have identified as the marks of the church, but I thought perhaps that some of my blog readers might like to suggest some answers.

If you could list up to five marks of the church, what would they be?

Feel free to give your own answer, or suggest an answer representative of different groups of churches (e.g. charismatic, emerging, reformed, mainline protestant etc).

Book Review – Body Beautiful (Melvin Tinker & Nathan Buttery)

Despite what the title might conjure up in your mind, this is actually another book on the church. The subtitle is "Recovering the Biblical View of the Church". It is written by a couple of Anglican Ministers in Hull, and their approach is to simply take 11 short New Testament passages relating to the church, and briefly expound them.

The book is 125 pages long, and fairly accessible. It was perhaps written with small-group study in mind, as it has a section of question for further discussion. The aim of the book is to present the Biblical model of the church and challenge us as to whether we view church in the same way.

The authors are particularly keen to emphasise the importance of the Word of God in the church, being the basis for what we do, and central to the life of the church. The Word of God, or the Gospel, is the ‘rock’ on which the church is built. Expository preaching and Bible ministry are seen as key to a healthy church.

They examine the "marks of a church" from Acts 2:42-47 arguing that success should not simply be measured in terms of numbers attending, but in being a learning, caring, committed and growing church.

There are two chapters looking at passages from Ephesians on the Call of the Church and Unity within the church. In a chapter on worship, they criticise Catholic and charismatic worship as being "BC" (before Christ) worship – as they go through a "mediator" of a priest or worship leader who draws us near to God. Rather they emphasise that the whole of life is to be worship, and worship should be defined as "engaging with God".

There is a helpful section on prayer. A praying church is a God-centred church and the their prayers will be God-centred. Prayer should be our natural reaction. If it is not, we are not a God-centred people.

In a chapter on the influence of the church, they encourage Christians to engage politically, but more importantly, to make a difference by being different where they are. Christians are called to be a people who leave a blessing wherever we go.

… central to all of God’s plans and purposes for his entire universe is his church.

Overall, this is a very helpful short book on the church. In perhaps a few places, as a charismatic, I might disagree with some of their statements, and a couple of the illustrations were a bit dated or Anglican specific. But on the whole, it is well worth a read, particularly if you don’t want to tackle something too long.

Commentaries and NIV for e-Sword

Just a quick update to say that I have finally updated my commentaries page. It is at a new location now as I have rewritten it using .NET in a way that will make it easier for me to keep up to date (and hopefully add some new features to it). The number of commentaries I have on file is slowly growing towards the 1000 mark. I’ve also done a lot of work updating some of the ISBNs to the new ISBN-13 standard and fixing broken publisher links, although there is still a long way to go as the switchover to ISBN13 has made most publishers reorganise their sites. I’ve added links to the new Baker Exegetical Commentaries volumes as well as updated a few other series as well.

The other thing that may be of interest is that finally, the NIV is available for e-Sword. For those of you that don’t already know, e-Sword is a great free Bible study tool that allows you to search and compare multiple Bible versions, including Greek and Hebrew. There is lots of free material available, including the excellent ESV translation of the Bible. You do have to pay for the NIV, but it is made available as part of the NIV Family Bundle from eStudySource which includes NIV, TNIV and the NIRV, all for $30. There seems to be a growing amount of material on estudysource including some commentaries. I’m hoping that IVP will make the Tyndale or Bible Speaks Today series available for e-Sword.

Book Review – The Message of Zechariah (Barry Webb)


Brief Summary

A 186 page commentary / exposition of the book of Zechariah. It is part of the Bible Speaks Today series which generally follows an expositional format – not just explaining the Scriptures but applying it.  The subtitle is “Your Kingdom Come” and the whole exposition of the book takes a kingdom perspective.

The Introduction

The introduction is a fairly generous 30 pages, and Webb shows that the structure of the book is eight visions followed by two oracles. He sums up the main theme by saying “it is a book about the future coming of the kingdom of God, and the need to live now in the light of it”. He also points out sub-themes of repentance and cleansing as well as an key theme of the Messiah running through the book. He puts Zechariah’s prophecy into its historical context, but also is very careful to show how his message is directly applicable to us, as we have the same concern to see God’s kingdom come. He highlights how regularly the NT writers draw from the book of Zechariah.

The Commentary

The commentary itself is able to devote a couple of pages to each small section of Zechariah which gives enough space to explain and apply the text adequately. Webb generally avoids detailed discussions of historical context or Hebrew grammar, and is cautious in offering his interpretations of some of the more obscure visions.

He shows how there is a progression in the visions of the first six chapters that culminate in God’s judgment and rule over all the earth. He acknowledges that chapter 7 marks a new beginning, but argues that it is not unrelated to what had gone before. In chapters 10 and 11, he draws out a major theme of leadership – true shepherds are those who trust in God and lead others to do the same.

… it is impossible to be in relationship with God unless we are prepared to be ruled by him.

When he comes to chapter 13, he explains the links to Jesus, and there is also a brief excursus that deals in more detail with the use of Zechariah in the New Testament. He argues that the Old Testament prophecies concerning the kingdom of God are fulfilled in the events of Jesus’ life – his birth, ministry, death, resurrection, ascension and return. Hence there are elements of kingdom prophecy in Zechariah yet to be fulfilled.

Strengths

For me, the great strength of this volume is how he consistently draws us to the Christological and New Covenant implications and interpretation of the book. He takes what can be a perplexing book, and brings out a very challenging and practical message of the kingdom of God.

Weaknesses

Nothing to complain of. It was the right length. It obviously isn’t an academic treatment of Zechariah, and also those looking for detailed and speculative explanations of every last detail of the visions will be disappointed. But it ranks as one of my favourites in the BST series.

Why Buy It?

As with pretty much all the BST volumes, this is ideal if you are personally studying or planning to preach or teach on the book of Zechariah.